Page 10 of 13: businesses ranked 901-1000 of 1208. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.
One five-star review mentioning roof work. Review text is minimal, so detail on specific services and outcomes is limited. The business's website lists roof consulting, evaluation, leak management, and thermographic analysis across Canada since 1995.
One five-star review supports this business, though the sample is too small to draw firm conclusions about service quality or consistency.
One five-star review supports TRB Roofing's service. Evidence is limited; the single review provides minimal detail about specific work or customer experience. This profile reflects early reputation; more reviews would clarify service consistency and expertise.
Limited review data available: this business carries a 5.0 average from 1 Google review. Their website lists roof and chimney repairs, foundational waterproofing, and related construction services.
Review evidence is limited but heavily negative. Reviewers report collapsed roofs, exposed nails, missing underlayment and ice protection, damage from unscheduled visits, and refusal to accept responsibility. A handful of five-star ratings praise quality or history, but these lack detail and are vastly outnumbered by accounts of poor installation and customer service failures.
Older reviews praise Harry and his team for timely, skilled roof work and fair pricing. Recent complaints describe months of missed appointments, incomplete jobs, and customers forced to hire others at extra cost to finish the work.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Seeback Roofing & Sheet Metal has deep market experience and broad service credentials, but a 3.2 average from nine reviews shows polarized customer outcomes. Review detail is too limited to pinpoint what divides satisfied from dissatisfied clients.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Both reviewers praised Nouveau's professionalism, timely work, and clean job sites. Ryan's team explains costs clearly and delivers finished roofs without disruption or mess.
United Roofing holds a perfect 5.0 rating on one Google review. Review detail is limited; specific praise or service patterns cannot be drawn from the available evidence.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Three strong jobs with fast turnaround, courteous staff, and meticulous cleanup earned high marks. One old complaint about persistent unwanted fax communications raised a red flag. Evidence is limited by only four reviews spanning five years.
Both reviews praise Mac The Roofer for skilled work across multiple services, from roof and chimney repair to gutter and skylight jobs, completed efficiently with strong cleanup and fair pricing. Limited evidence available (2 five-star reviews); no complaints recorded.
Two separate reviews document poor behavior by Atlantic Roofers staff and drivers: one parking inconsiderately and refusing a polite request, another operating unsafely on the QEW. No positive work or service details surface in available reviews.
Steve brings strong technical skill and a tidy work ethic. Both reviewers note quality results, professional conduct, and clean site management across their jobs.
Two five-star reviews from 8 years ago praise York Custom Aluminum for fast, expert eavestrough and downpipe installation. Staff personalization and leaf guard systems stood out to reviewers, though review volume is limited.
Reviewers consistently praise Manny and his crew for hands-on, clean work and responsive service. The owner personally estimates and works on-site, backed by a steady team that shows up on time and cleans thoroughly. A minority object to the $50 estimate fee; isolated complaints lack detail.
Roof work earns consistent praise, including snow removal help. One reviewer flagged unprofessional driving behaviour. Limited recent review activity makes a full picture hard to form.
Two reviewers from 8 years ago praised Tight Roofing for speed, cleanliness, and polite service. Limited recent review evidence available.
Two five-star reviews from a decade ago praise David and Globe's structural expertise, clear quotes, and punctual work on sagging roofs and flat roofs. However, a 3.0 average across 4 reviews and a 50% split between five-star and one/two-star ratings suggest recent or unaddressed issues; review count is too small to confirm current performance.
Limited review evidence available. Their website states they offer re-roofing, flat roofing, siding, skylights, gutters, insulation, and commercial work across the GTA, with 10 years' operating history and full insurance and licensing.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
One reviewer alleged staff deliberately damaged roof shingles during an unsolicited estimate and falsely claimed urgent chimney replacement was needed, contrary to recent inspector findings. A second reviewer called the company great, but the weight of evidence rests on the serious damage claim.
Two customers report aggressive sales tactics, wildly inflated estimates (up to $12,000 vs. actual $2,500), and invented damage claims to justify high prices. One positive interaction noted respect when a gutter offer was declined; however, two one-star reviews detail pressure sales targeting seniors with false urgency.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Frank and his team earn strong marks for professional work, fair rates, and a caring approach that makes clients feel valued. One older complaint notes rudeness, but recent feedback emphasizes trustworthiness and quality across roofing, siding, and gutter jobs.
Reviewers split sharply on Hunter Roofing. Those satisfied praise professionalism, clean work, and competitive rates. Others report serious post-installation failures: poor flashing causing major leaks and mold, siding coming loose, gutters leaking. A key complaint: the owner (Israel) goes unresponsive when problems emerge. Note: only 8 reviews; detail is limited.
Enr Roofing Inc operates in Stoney Creek with mixed reviews. The 3.7-star average across three ratings reflects split experiences, with two-thirds five-star but one-third one or two-star. Limited review detail prevents deeper insight into specific strengths or concerns.
Half of recent reviews rank this business five stars, with praise for skilled technicians and quality copper gutter work. The other half report long waits for callbacks and no response on warranty claims.
One five-star review praises named staff (Robert, Enzo, Steven) and early completion of a flat roof job, while a one-star review from seven years ago cites incomplete work and surprise charges. Evidence is thin: only two reviews, both several years old, with conflicting outcomes.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Two reviews detail serious problems: a roofing truck driven recklessly in a school zone, and a flat roof repair that left the original drainage issue unresolved. The owner (Steve) did not verify slope during reconstruction and later avoided the customer's repeated requests for correction. Limited evidence available.
Five of six reviews praise responsiveness, competitive pricing, and solid work on straightforward jobs. One recent one-star review details failed skylight installations, extended water damage during winter, delayed repairs, and poor communication when problems arose. The pattern suggests strong execution on new work but inconsistent aftercare when issues emerge.
Review evidence is limited to one 1-star rating. The business states it has offered residential and commercial metal roofing since 2009, with installation priced at $15 to $25 per square foot.
Three one-star reviews describe roof leaks returning within months, blocked phone numbers, and invoices never sent despite repeated requests over four months. Two older five-star reviews praised speed and crew reliability, but the recent pattern shows persistent quality and communication failures.
Two one-star reviews from eight or more years ago cite refusal to provide estimates and poor customer service. Two five-star reviews, older still, praise workmanship and customer loyalty. The 3.0 average across just four reviews reflects this sharp divide; current business practices are unclear.
One five-star account from two years ago praised speed and professionalism under Tony's crew, but two recent one-star reviews document serious issues: a roof repair that leaked three months later with no callback support, and eavestrough damage during installation that Manuel refused to address under warranty. Most recent complaint is six years old but remains unresolved.
One reviewer reported substandard roof work requiring a second contractor to fix. Limited review data available.
Experience here splits sharply: skilled crew tackles leaks others fail to fix and responds fast to emergencies, but pricing is steep and communication breaks down between jobs. Some customers praise their speed; others report months-long voicemail delays, failed repairs, and charged service calls that included no work.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
One customer reported abandonment after taking a deposit two years ago. Another was satisfied with the completed work. Evidence is limited, and the stark split between ratings reflects inconsistent project outcomes or service delivery.
One customer reports being misled by staff (Subeer Niamat Amaani) on pricing and warranty terms, with no follow-up support. Another praises the crew for honest roof assessment and photographic proof that work wasn't needed. Evidence is thin across just two reviews, separated by years.
Both available reviews document serious incidents involving technician aggression and threats of violence. No positive feedback is evident. Evidence is limited to two one-star reviews from two years ago.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
A 2.3-star business with conflicting evidence: one reviewer praised completion of jobs others failed, but another reported costs that spiralled from $2,500 to $145,000 across three separate contracts as problems emerged during winter work. Fake review activity reported to Google. Evidence is limited.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
One review criticizes slow project timelines, unresponsive communication, late site inspections that disrupted contractor payments, and repeated budget increases. Limited review evidence; single-star rating reflects significant dissatisfaction.
One review from seven years ago reports a deteriorating relationship with the owner, Mo, over unfinished work and multiple missed appointment commitments. Evidence is limited to a single account.
Triumph Roofing operates across Canada with over 37 years' experience and offers roofing, waterproofing, and building envelope services. Review evidence is limited: three Google ratings show a 3.7 average with sharply divided opinions (67% five-star, 33% one/two-star), offering little detail on specific strengths or concerns.
Two one-star reviews over four years paint a picture of repeated failures: a roof vent placed incorrectly, no-shows after promises to fix it, and a roof lifting years later with no response to calls or texts. Owner Allen is named in both complaints for being unresponsive and unprofessional. No positive feedback exists to balance the record.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Two one-star reviews from separate years describe unresolved leaks, heavy ancillary charges, poor communication, late arrivals, and rude staff. Evidence for broader performance is limited.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
One reviewer praised repeat work and local referrals; another warns the warranty does not hold after payment. Limited review evidence makes this a cautious choice.
Of 16 reviews, 15 report serious problems: roofs installed incorrectly, leaking within months or years, and warranty claims ignored or denied. Owners and salespeople do not return calls. One favourable review credits Tony and affordable pricing, but overwhelming evidence points to shoddy installation, debris left behind, and company refusal to stand behind work.
One five-star account praises leak repair work; the other four reviews warn of scams, abandonment, and fake photos. Evidence is limited and dated (three years old), but the volume of scam allegations raises serious concerns.
Two reviewers report serious unresolved problems. One had a chimney roof leak that recurred three times in nine years despite a 50-year guarantee; the business website and phone are now inactive. Another customer was stood up for a scheduled appointment. Limited evidence suggests this business may no longer be operating.
All three Google reviews rate this business at one star. Customers report a metal roof installation left gaps allowing squirrels into the attic, unmet warranty promises, and ignored calls when problems arose. A follow-up contractor confirmed the work had cut corners.
Custom Roofing Oakville is a full-service roofing and exterior contractor serving Uptown Core Oakville and surrounding areas. Their website claims 25+ years in business, Owens Corning Preferred Contractor status, A+ rating, and full licensing. Review evidence is limited; this profile is drawn from their stated services and credentials only.
Platinum Roofing & Exteriors is a Burlington-based roofing, siding, and skylight contractor operating since 2008. Their website lists multiple manufacturer certifications (CertainTeed, GAF, VELUX, IKO, Alu-Rex) and claims A+ BBB status with five consecutive Top Choice Awards. Review evidence is limited; credibility rests on published credentials and stated service scope across the Greater Toronto Area.
Platinum Roofing & Exteriors operates from Meadowvale (Mississauga) and lists services across roof replacement, repair, metal and flat roofing, skylights, siding, gutters, and insulation. Their website states they hold CertainTeed, VELUX, IKO, and GAF certifications and serve the Hamilton-to-Guelph region. Direct review evidence is limited.
Aquaseal Roofing and Exteriors operates from Old Toronto and claims 15 years in business serving the Toronto area. The business lists residential, commercial, and flat roofing work alongside gutter, chimney, and lead repair services, and states it is licensed and insured. Review evidence is limited and does not permit detailed assessment of service quality or customer experience.
Last updated 2026-09-25